RSS Feed

Tag Archives: Fiction

Atheism is not nihilism

I am an atheist. And there is often an inherent difficulty when entering a dialogue about religion. People can become offended by what comes out of it. My hero, Douglas Adams (I wrote a post about him yesterday), put it this way:

“the invention of the scientific method and science is…the most powerful intellectual idea… it rests on the premise that any idea is there to be attacked and if it withstands the attack then it lives to fight another day and if it doesn’t withstand the attack then down it goes. Religion doesn’t seem to work like that; it has certain ideas at the heart of it which we call sacred or holy or whatever. That’s an idea we’re so familiar with…that it’s kind of odd to think what it actually means, because really what it means is ‘Here is an idea or a notion that you’re not allowed to say anything bad about; you’re just not. Why not? – because you’re not!’ If somebody votes for a party that you don’t agree with, you’re free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it…But, the moment I say something that has something to do with somebody’s (I’m going to stick my neck out here and say irrational) beliefs, then we all become terribly protective and terribly defensive and say ‘No, we don’t attack that; that’s an irrational belief but no, we respect it’.”

At ‘Digital Biota 2′, Cambridge, September 1998

I am not in the business of offending people. And I am not in the business of accusing those that hold a belief in a god or gods of being foolish or unintelligent. This is an unfair and unreasonable stance to take, in my opinion. There are historical, cultural and social reasons that people find themselves holding a belief in a god. Although I may have assessed the situation from my perspective and come out the other end as a firm atheist, I don’t take the attitude that those that have not done the same are, somehow, unreasonable.

I do, however, think they are wrong. And this is where Adams’ argument that religion, like anything, should be open to discussion is realised – I respect a person’s right to believe in a god, but I happen to disagree with the conclusion they’ve arrived at.

Here’s my bizarre voice explaining more.

Irrational Nonsense Blues – A song I wrote with Ross Exton.

I was very conscious of how I was discussing religion when I wrote my novel because it could, at times, seem as though I am directly mocking anyone that holds a religious belief. I was extremely careful not to be outlandish or aimlessly provocative in my writing, but the entire premise of the book (and the original idea) comes out of an interest in the subject of why people are so drawn to religious beliefs in the first place. And I am interested. Fascinated, actually. Although I am of the opinion that a belief in a god is an irrational belief, I can rationally understand why such a belief would exist. Read the rest of this entry

Why Douglas Adams was a genius.

For many there’s nothing more humourless than insisting on analysing humour. E.B. White famously said: “Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog. Few people are interested and the frog dies of it.” I can agree to an extent, to begin over-analysing why something is funny can end up sucking the humour out of it. On the other hand, I think that when we find something funny, we are making those connections in our minds anyway. Humour is often about drawing attention to the familiar, or finding a common understanding, and so to dismiss laughter as a simple reaction that isn’t the result of any thought does comedy, and the people who enjoy it, a disservice. I would argue that we laugh because we understand why something is funny. It’s strange that White’s oft-quoted take on analysing humour (and who knows how serious he was being about it anyway) is both humorous and seemingly worthy of analysis. Even the language choice of ‘the frog dies of it’ is a great punch-line. So, it turns out, for better or worse, that I am a person that is interested in analysing it. As well as being interested in humour for humour’s sake, I’m also interested in comedy that uses humour to say something, and I think almost all comedy does.

The Hitchhiker’s Guide series is as silly as it is smart, and as thought-provoking as it is humorous. Adams chose to deal with our species’ position in the Universe from the very opening of the first novel in this series. Read the rest of this entry

Read the first chapter of Cult Fiction on a fancy widget.

The first chapter of Cult Fiction can be read on this fancy page-turny widget thing. You’ll need Flash on your computer-box, but everyone has flash on their computer-box, right? If not, it’s a perfectly safe bit of software from Adobe (I promise from the bottom of my heart) that you can get for free here: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/

Have a perfectly acceptable day.

Short Stories

This post, ironically, started out as me just posting a link, and then expanded into a post when I started to try and describe the link. To understand this irony, please see all of the words below.

I’ve been trying to get into the habit of writing some more flash fiction. (I wrote some yesterday, in fact, that I sent to the same website that posted my last piece to see if they wanted to post this one. If they don’t then I’ll post it here. Either way, it’ll be available soon.) The reason I want to write more is because I have a big old dissertation to write and I can see it sapping away the time I get to do the more fun kind of writing. Flash fiction’s a good way to keep me ticking over because I find it’s about coming up with one idea or one scene and just starting and seeing what happens. Plus 750 words or so is a lot quicker to write than a novel, I find. So, once again I’m writing a post without thinking about how it relates more directly to this blog’s ‘remit’, but I suppose I’ll say this – it’s probably a good idea to keep writing if you want to be a writer.

Anyway, back to flash fiction (although, strictly speaking, the post I’m about to link to is about short stories – normally a bit longer than flash fiction – but I think the principle about the way people read them are the same). This is a post by Sean Smith discussing the short story from his blog ersatz esoterica, and it’s where I found a link to this article by Nicholas Royle about short stories. I liked both Sean’s and Nicholas’ take on the short story.

Sean says:

“a story that is designed to be read in one fell swoop forces back the tedium of reality and its responsibilities. It doesn’t let you out – you are forced to maintain your suspension of disbelief until it is done.”

Nicholas says:

“There’s a particular intimacy you get with a short story, partly because you usually read it in a single sitting…Also, precisely because short stories are short, writers tend to feel more inclined to take risks, try something new.”

That last sentence is definitely true. With the bits I’ve written here and there I’ve always been trying to go for a different style, or to try something new. However, there’s a chance I could be considered some kind of nasty betrayer of short stories or flash fiction, because whenever I write one there is always a thought running through my mind about how I could apply what I’ve written to something bigger, in the hope that this small idea I’m jotting down could end up expanding into another novel.

This could be considered a good thing, it’s an exercise and a way of coming up with new ideas without being frightened by the vast word-count needed to cobble together a novel, but it also suggests that short stories for me aren’t enough on their own, that they’re incomplete novels. And I’m certain that’s not true, but, like Sean, I’m aware that short stories are not part of the curriculum, and they don’t really make their way into the canon of the ‘classics’ that everyone must read to supposedly become some kind of a real person.

Should they? Which ones do you think deserve to be? Let Sean know on his post.

Despite all of this lovely acceptance of short stories that seems to be going on in this post that I’m accidentally writing, though, this blog is meant to be, somewhere along the way, about novel-writing, and so I suppose I should try and reign it back in, and, without wanting to sound like some peddler of hideous cod-philosophy: every novel has to begin without anything at all having been written. Some people might be lucky and have the whole thing mapped out in their noggins before they’ve put pen to paper or digit to keyboard, but most of us aren’t superhuman freaks.

Cult Fiction originated in a couple of bits of nothing much I’d written. One bit was really a short story about something totally unrelated to what the novel would eventually become, but I used an idea from it to create a reasonably crucial part of the finished thing (and it was the title of this, The Platinum Staircase, that was the original title of the novel).

So, I suppose I could conclude with something like this – perhaps it’s a good idea to think small before we try to go for the big guy that is the novel. Maybe a self-contained short story is a great way to start in working towards something bigger, especially if the idea of writing a whole novel seems daunting? Although, maybe that’s a disservice to what a short story can do on its own, as a piece of fiction that can keep its readers’ attention throughout the whole story without interruption? And wouldn’t it dampens the impact of the original short story if you spent the whole time thinking about the bigger option rather than concentrating on making it work as a short story in its own right? Or maybe I’ve done it again and I’m just asking rhetorical questions that I never intend to answer? I don’t know. Whatever. I’m going to make a sandwich or something.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 32 other followers